WireGuard vs OpenVPN
A detailed comparison to help you choose between WireGuard and OpenVPN.
WireGuard Modern, fast, and simple VPN protocol. | OpenVPN Battle-tested open-source VPN protocol. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 (51 reviews) | 4.5 (386 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | free |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Best For | Best for users prioritizing fast VPN connections for streaming and browsing | Best for users seeking reliable VPN protection for online privacy |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
WireGuard
Pros
- + Fast, modern cryptography with fixed suite
- + Simple key-based setup and configuration
- + Linux kernel integration for strong performance
- + Roaming handles changing client IP addresses
- + Optional pre-shared key for extra hardening
Cons
- - UDP-only; no TCP tunneling built in
- - Not a VPN service; no privacy policy included
- - No native dynamic address assignment
- - AllowedIPs mistakes can break routing or leaks
- - Needs external obfuscation for hostile networks
OpenVPN
Pros
- + Open-source GPL core with public code
- + Free Access Server tier supports two connections
- + DCO kernel offload improves Access Server performance
- + Independent OpenVPN code audits published
- + Works with OpenVPN-protocol compatible servers
Cons
- - OpenVPN Connect is not a VPN service
- - Free tier capped at two simultaneous connections
- - Privacy depends on server operator and configuration
- - Performance varies without DCO and tuning
- - Third-party apps may bundle outdated OpenVPN code
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.