Vivaldi vs LibreWolf
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Vivaldi and LibreWolf.
Vivaldi Highly customizable browser with built-in ad blocker. | LibreWolf Firefox fork with privacy by default — no telemetry. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 (492 reviews) | 4.6 (271 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | free |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Best For | Best for users wanting to block ads and trackers across the web | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Vivaldi
Pros
- + Built-in tracker and ad blocker
- + Integrated Proton VPN option inside browser
- + Sync data is end-to-end encrypted
- + Chromium-based: strong site and extension compatibility
- + Company based in Norway and Iceland
Cons
- - Built-in VPN is only for Vivaldi web traffic
- - Not fully open source; UI remains closed
- - Sync retains metadata and up to one-year inactivity data
- - Sync privacy incident previously affected Snapshot users
LibreWolf
Pros
- + Strong privacy defaults out of the box
- + uBlock Origin included with custom filter lists
- + Resist Fingerprinting enabled by default
- + Telemetry and studies disabled/removed
- + Total Cookie Protection (dFPI) enabled
- + LibreWolf UI plus overrides for tuning
Cons
- - More site breakage than stock Firefox
- - DRM disabled by default; streaming may fail
- - Updates depend on packaging and user hygiene
- - WebGL disabled by default; some apps break
- - Past report of URLs logged to system journal
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.