Tutanota vs Mailbox.org
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Tutanota and Mailbox.org.
Tutanota Encrypted email with E2E encryption for emails and calendars. | Mailbox.org Privacy-focused email with PGP support and cloud. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 (64 reviews) | 4.2 (213 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | From $0/mo | From $1/mo |
| Best For | Best for users needing encrypted email communication | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Tutanota
Pros
- + End-to-end encryption integrated across apps
- + Open-source web, desktop, and mobile clients
- + Encrypted local search index, not server-side
- + Transparent reporting on legal requests
- + No IMAP by design reduces server-side exposure
Cons
- - No IMAP/POP support for third-party clients
- - Not PGP-based; limited external interoperability
- - Plaintext emails can be monitored under court order
- - Refund process can require separate revocation step
Mailbox.org
Pros
- + Works with IMAP/SMTP/POP3 and CalDAV/CardDAV
- + Tiered plans include Drive, Office, and Meet
- + Publishes transparency reports on authority requests
- + Supports many aliases and custom domains on paid tiers
- + Drops obsolete TLS versions; modern baseline security
Cons
- - No free plan; paid service even for basics
- - YubiKey support reportedly broken with Login 2.0
- - Not fully open source, per third-party review
- - ActiveSync has documented limitations vs open protocols
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.