Sync.com vs Internxt
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Sync.com and Internxt.
Sync.com Zero-knowledge encrypted cloud storage. | Internxt Open-source, zero-knowledge encrypted cloud storage from Spain. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 (419 reviews) | 4.2 (290 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | paid | freemium |
| Starting Price | From $8/mo | From $0/mo |
| Best For | Best for users needing secure cloud storage for sensitive files | Best for users needing secure cloud storage for sensitive files |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Sync.com
Pros
- + Client-side encryption positioned as default
- + Privacy Center documents feature trade-offs
- + 2FA and device lockout controls available
- + Desktop app supports resume for large transfers
- + File-level deduplication reduces re-uploads
- + SOC 3 report documents security controls
Cons
- - Hard limit: 5 active devices per account
- - Recovery options can reduce strict zero-knowledge
- - Web uploads can degrade on large files
- - No block-level sync optimization for big edits
- - No public cryptographic audit found
Internxt
Pros
- + Client-side encryption for file contents
- + Open-source Drive apps on GitHub
- + Rclone and WebDAV options for advanced workflows
- + Free 1GB plan for testing
- + 30-day money-back guarantee on paid plans
- + 2FA support via authenticator apps
Cons
- - Metadata like filenames and sizes is stored server-side
- - Backup can behave like one-way mirroring
- - Lifetime plans vary; reseller deals may exclude features
- - Reports of inconsistent reliability and support
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.