Surfshark vs Ultahost
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Surfshark and Ultahost.
Surfshark VPN with unlimited devices | Ultahost Fast VPN with 40% recurring affiliate payout. Global server network. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 (18000 reviews) | 4.1 (591 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | From $2.49/mo | From $3.29/mo |
| Best For | Best budget VPN for families | Best for users prioritizing fast VPN connections for streaming and browsing |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
| Visit Surfshark → |
Surfshark
Pros
- + Unlimited simultaneous device connections
- + WireGuard, OpenVPN, and IKEv2 support
- + Customizable Dynamic MultiHop routes
- + RAM-only server network design
- + Audited no-logs assurance (Deloitte reported)
- + CleanWeb ad, tracker, and malware blocking
Cons
- - No permanent free VPN tier, only trial/refund
- - CleanWeb blocking lags some competitors in tests
- - No-logs policy still allows brief operational metadata
- - Bundled products increase data processing surface area
Ultahost
Pros
- + Many global datacenter locations for VPS placement
- + Supports OpenVPN and WireGuard self-host setups
- + Multi-term discounts on VPS plans
- + 30-day money-back guarantee advertised
- + You control VPN keys and configuration
Cons
- - Not a consumer VPN network with audited no-logs
- - Self-hosting requires sysadmin skills and maintenance
- - US jurisdiction may concern privacy-focused users
- - Hosting reliability complaints appear in public reviews
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.