SOAX vs Pi-hole
A detailed comparison to help you choose between SOAX and Pi-hole.
SOAX Residential proxies and scraping infrastructure | Pi-hole Network-wide ad blocker for Raspberry Pi. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.5 (213 reviews) | 4.7 (498 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | paid | free |
| Starting Price | From $0/mo | Free |
| Best For | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools | Best for users wanting to block ads and trackers across the web |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
SOAX
Pros
- + HTTP/HTTPS/SOCKS5 support with TCP/UDP transport
- + Geo targeting: country, region, city, ISP
- + Packages separate auth, rules, and usage tracking
- + DNS resolution and domain-blocking controls
- + Transparent per-GB pricing with geo tiers
Cons
- - Not a consumer VPN or true anonymity tool
- - Non-refundable fees by default per refund policy
- - Usage billing counts retries and partial responses
- - No independent no-logs audit confirmed in sources
Pi-hole
Pros
- + Network-wide blocking for all DNS-using devices
- + Responsive admin dashboard with per-client visibility
- + Group-based policies for clients and block rules
- + Optional DHCP server when router is limited
- + Upstream encrypted DNS supported via dnscrypt-proxy
Cons
- - DNS-level blocking can’t remove same-domain ads
- - Client-side DoH or VPN can bypass filtering
- - Query logging can expose sensitive browsing metadata
- - Requires self-hosting, updates, and basic ops skills
- - Past v6 WebUI/API DoS advisory (patched later)
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.