SOAX vs IPRoyal
A detailed comparison to help you choose between SOAX and IPRoyal.
SOAX Residential proxies and scraping infrastructure | IPRoyal Residential, datacenter and mobile proxies | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.5 (213 reviews) | 3.5 (125 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $0/mo | From $0/mo |
| Best For | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools | Best for mobile users needing on-the-go privacy protection |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
SOAX
Pros
- + HTTP/HTTPS/SOCKS5 support with TCP/UDP transport
- + Geo targeting: country, region, city, ISP
- + Packages separate auth, rules, and usage tracking
- + DNS resolution and domain-blocking controls
- + Transparent per-GB pricing with geo tiers
Cons
- - Not a consumer VPN or true anonymity tool
- - Non-refundable fees by default per refund policy
- - Usage billing counts retries and partial responses
- - No independent no-logs audit confirmed in sources
IPRoyal
Pros
- + HTTP/HTTPS and SOCKS5 supported for residential proxies
- + Sticky sessions supported up to 7 days
- + Rotation controls and instant IP change via API
- + Multiple proxy types: residential, ISP, datacenter, mobile
- + Public entry pricing and billing units listed
Cons
- - Refund eligibility depends on usage and time windows
- - Not positioned as an audited no-logs privacy VPN
- - Real-world performance varies by geo and target site
- - UAE jurisdiction may not suit all risk models
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.