Shadowsocks vs SoftEther
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Shadowsocks and SoftEther.
Shadowsocks Encrypted proxy designed for bypassing censorship. | SoftEther Multi-protocol VPN server supporting SSL-VPN, L2TP, OpenVPN, and SSTP. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 (122 reviews) | 4.4 (258 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | free |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Best For | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools | Best for users seeking reliable VPN protection for online privacy |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Shadowsocks
Pros
- + Free and open-source protocol ecosystem
- + Modern AEAD ciphers are documented and recommended
- + SIP003 plugins enable obfuscation and transports
- + Can proxy both TCP and UDP traffic
- + Flexible self-hosting and deployment options
- + Lightweight compared to many full VPN tunnels
Cons
- - Not a turnkey VPN service or subscription
- - Privacy/logging depends on your server and host
- - Not automatically a full-device tunnel
- - Some implementations have had security advisories
- - Blocking resistance varies with configuration
SoftEther
Pros
- + Multi-protocol server: SoftEther, OpenVPN, SSTP, IPsec
- + Built-in Dynamic DNS and NAT Traversal features
- + Open-source code under Apache License 2.0
- + Designed to work over HTTPS-shaped traffic
- + Supports L2TPv3/IPsec and EtherIP/IPsec modes
Cons
- - Not a consumer VPN service with exit locations
- - Can enable detailed packet logging if misconfigured
- - Requires ongoing patching and secure administration
- - SoftEther protocol security details require careful review
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.