Session vs Element
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Session and Element.
Session Decentralized messenger — no phone number required. | Element Decentralized messenger built on Matrix protocol. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 (58 reviews) | 4.0 (461 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | free |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Best For | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Session
Pros
- + No phone number or email required
- + Onion-routed message transport hides IP addresses
- + Decentralized network supports offline message delivery
- + Open-source clients with public GitHub repos
- + Publicly documented third-party security audit
- + Android can use F-Droid repo
Cons
- - Fast push uses FCM, exposing IP and token
- - Research shows practical attacks on Protocol V1
- - Some features have different metadata properties than texts
- - UX can be less reliable than mainstream messengers
Element
Pros
- + Works across Matrix servers; supports federation
- + End-to-end encryption supported and encouraged by default
- + Open-source client code available on GitHub
- + Secure Backup and device verification for multi-device E2EE
- + Element Call roadmap for modern voice/video
Cons
- - Encrypted rooms still expose some metadata to servers
- - Multi-device encryption setup can be confusing
- - Enterprise pricing is sales-led, not fully public
- - Security track record includes past critical client vulnerabilities
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.