Quad9 vs IPRoyal
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Quad9 and IPRoyal.
Quad9 Non-profit DNS resolver with threat blocking (9.9.9.9). | IPRoyal Residential, datacenter and mobile proxies | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 (432 reviews) | 3.5 (125 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | paid |
| Starting Price | Free | From $0/mo |
| Best For | Best for users wanting private and fast DNS resolution | Best for mobile users needing on-the-go privacy protection |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Quad9
Pros
- + Free resolver; no account or sign-up required
- + Threat-blocking option for malicious domains
- + Supports DoT, DoH, DNSCrypt, DoH3, DoQ
- + States it does not store client IP addresses
- + Opt-in ECS endpoint for better CDN geolocation
- + Transparent block behavior and tester guidance
Cons
- - Not a VPN; websites still see your IP
- - ECS mode leaks partial client network info
- - NXDOMAIN blocking can confuse troubleshooting
- - No independent no-logs audit confirmed in sources
IPRoyal
Pros
- + HTTP/HTTPS and SOCKS5 supported for residential proxies
- + Sticky sessions supported up to 7 days
- + Rotation controls and instant IP change via API
- + Multiple proxy types: residential, ISP, datacenter, mobile
- + Public entry pricing and billing units listed
Cons
- - Refund eligibility depends on usage and time windows
- - Not positioned as an audited no-logs privacy VPN
- - Real-world performance varies by geo and target site
- - UAE jurisdiction may not suit all risk models
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.