PYPROXY vs Quad9
A detailed comparison to help you choose between PYPROXY and Quad9.
PYPROXY Proxy services for web scraping | Quad9 Non-profit DNS resolver with threat blocking (9.9.9.9). | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.5 (92 reviews) | 4.5 (432 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | paid | free |
| Starting Price | From $0/mo | Free |
| Best For | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools | Best for users wanting private and fast DNS resolution |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
PYPROXY
Pros
- + Non-expiring per-GB traffic on rotating products
- + HTTP(S) and SOCKS5 support across products
- + Sticky sessions up to 30 minutes
- + IP whitelisting option for HTTP(S) access
- + Clear 7-day unused-traffic refund policy
Cons
- - Not a VPN; SOCKS5 is TCP-only
- - Crypto-only payments at time of writing
- - No SLA or guaranteed site compatibility
- - No independent no-logs audit shown
Quad9
Pros
- + Free resolver; no account or sign-up required
- + Threat-blocking option for malicious domains
- + Supports DoT, DoH, DNSCrypt, DoH3, DoQ
- + States it does not store client IP addresses
- + Opt-in ECS endpoint for better CDN geolocation
- + Transparent block behavior and tester guidance
Cons
- - Not a VPN; websites still see your IP
- - ECS mode leaks partial client network info
- - NXDOMAIN blocking can confuse troubleshooting
- - No independent no-logs audit confirmed in sources
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.