PYPROXY vs iCloud Private Relay
A detailed comparison to help you choose between PYPROXY and iCloud Private Relay.
PYPROXY Proxy services for web scraping | iCloud Private Relay Apple's privacy-focused internet relay for Safari. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.5 (92 reviews) | 4.2 (124 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $0/mo | From $0.99/mo |
| Best For | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
PYPROXY
Pros
- + Non-expiring per-GB traffic on rotating products
- + HTTP(S) and SOCKS5 support across products
- + Sticky sessions up to 30 minutes
- + IP whitelisting option for HTTP(S) access
- + Clear 7-day unused-traffic refund policy
Cons
- - Not a VPN; SOCKS5 is TCP-only
- - Crypto-only payments at time of writing
- - No SLA or guaranteed site compatibility
- - No independent no-logs audit shown
iCloud Private Relay
Pros
- + Two-hop design splits IP and destination visibility
- + ODoH protects DNS lookups from local networks
- + Integrated into iOS/iPadOS/macOS as a system feature
- + Keeps regional IP mapping to reduce site breakage
- + Included with iCloud+ plans (not a separate app)
Cons
- - Not a full-device VPN for all app traffic
- - Doesn’t let you choose another country/region
- - Can be blocked on work or school networks
- - Hard to validate logging without a public audit
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.