ProtonMail vs Tutanota
A detailed comparison to help you choose between ProtonMail and Tutanota.
ProtonMail End-to-end encrypted email | Tutanota Encrypted email with E2E encryption for emails and calendars. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 (20000 reviews) | 4.3 (64 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | From $0/mo | From $0/mo |
| Best For | Best encrypted email | Best for users needing encrypted email communication |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
ProtonMail
Pros
- + Automatic E2EE between Proton Mail users
- + Zero-access encryption for stored mailbox data
- + OpenPGP support for external encrypted email
- + Password-protected encrypted emails to anyone
- + Open-source client apps with published audits
- + Inbox tracking protection blocks pixels, hides IP
Cons
- - Not end-to-end encrypted to non-Proton by default
- - Metadata and headers aren’t fully encrypted
- - Can be compelled to log IP under Swiss orders
- - Free accounts may be deleted after 12 months inactive
Tutanota
Pros
- + End-to-end encryption integrated across apps
- + Open-source web, desktop, and mobile clients
- + Encrypted local search index, not server-side
- + Transparent reporting on legal requests
- + No IMAP by design reduces server-side exposure
Cons
- - No IMAP/POP support for third-party clients
- - Not PGP-based; limited external interoperability
- - Plaintext emails can be monitored under court order
- - Refund process can require separate revocation step
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.