Proton Pass vs KeePass
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Proton Pass and KeePass.
Proton Pass Password manager from Proton with built-in email aliases. | KeePass Classic offline password manager for Windows. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 (199 reviews) | 4.4 (224 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | free |
| Starting Price | From $0/mo | Free |
| Best For | Best for users managing multiple passwords securely | Best for users managing multiple passwords securely |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Proton Pass
Pros
- + Open-source apps with third-party security assessments
- + Strong published encryption/security documentation
- + Works on Firefox and Chromium-based browsers
- + Apps available across major desktop and mobile platforms
- + 30-day refund window for initial purchase
Cons
- - Extension autofill performance complaints on some Chromium browsers
- - Exact plan prices vary; verify at checkout
- - Password managers don’t map cleanly to “10 connections”
KeePass
Pros
- + Free and GPL-licensed software
- + Offline-first: vault is a local encrypted file
- + Supports AES-256 and ChaCha20 encryption
- + KDBX 4 supports Argon2id key derivation
- + Built-in database sync/merge in KeePass 2.x
- + Advanced Auto-Type plus obfuscation option
Cons
- - No first-party cloud sync; you must manage syncing
- - Some protocols require plugins like IOProtocolExt
- - Endpoint malware can still capture credentials
- - Audit information often applies to KeePassXC, not KeePass
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.