Private Internet Access vs Surfshark
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Private Internet Access and Surfshark.
Private Internet Access Open-source VPN with proven no-logs policy backed by court records. | Surfshark VPN with unlimited devices | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 (121 reviews) | 4.5 (18000 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | paid | freemium |
| Starting Price | From $2.03/mo | From $2.49/mo |
| Best For | Best for users seeking reliable VPN protection for online privacy | Best budget VPN for families |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
| Visit Surfshark → |
Private Internet Access
Pros
- + Published Deloitte no-logs audit reports
- + Open-source apps on GitHub
- + WireGuard and OpenVPN support
- + Split tunneling and multi-hop options
- + Port forwarding available in supported regions
- + Quarterly transparency reporting
Cons
- - US jurisdiction may not fit strict threat models
- - Port forwarding not available on all locations
- - Streaming access can be inconsistent by platform
- - MACE is limited versus full browser ad blockers
Surfshark
Pros
- + Unlimited simultaneous device connections
- + WireGuard, OpenVPN, and IKEv2 support
- + Customizable Dynamic MultiHop routes
- + RAM-only server network design
- + Audited no-logs assurance (Deloitte reported)
- + CleanWeb ad, tracker, and malware blocking
Cons
- - No permanent free VPN tier, only trial/refund
- - CleanWeb blocking lags some competitors in tests
- - No-logs policy still allows brief operational metadata
- - Bundled products increase data processing surface area
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.