Pi-hole vs Privacy Badger
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Pi-hole and Privacy Badger.
Pi-hole Network-wide ad blocker for Raspberry Pi. | Privacy Badger EFF's tracker blocker that learns which trackers to block. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 (498 reviews) | 4.2 (409 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | free |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Best For | Best for users wanting to block ads and trackers across the web | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Pi-hole
Pros
- + Network-wide blocking for all DNS-using devices
- + Responsive admin dashboard with per-client visibility
- + Group-based policies for clients and block rules
- + Optional DHCP server when router is limited
- + Upstream encrypted DNS supported via dnscrypt-proxy
Cons
- - DNS-level blocking can’t remove same-domain ads
- - Client-side DoH or VPN can bypass filtering
- - Query logging can expose sensitive browsing metadata
- - Requires self-hosting, updates, and basic ops skills
- - Past v6 WebUI/API DoS advisory (patched later)
Privacy Badger
Pros
- + Blocks third-party trackers based on behavior
- + Three-state controls reduce site breakage
- + Sends Global Privacy Control and Do Not Track
- + Open-source GPL-licensed codebase
- + Available on major desktop browsers
Cons
- - Not system-wide; only works in supported browsers
- - Can break websites; may need per-site disable
- - Not designed to stop first-party tracking
- - Learning approach and defaults changed over time
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.