Pi-hole vs Cloudflare DNS
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Pi-hole and Cloudflare DNS.
Pi-hole Network-wide ad blocker for Raspberry Pi. | Cloudflare DNS Fast public DNS (1.1.1.1) with WARP VPN option. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 (498 reviews) | 4.3 (309 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | free |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Best For | Best for users wanting to block ads and trackers across the web | Best for users prioritizing fast VPN connections for streaming and browsing |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Pi-hole
Pros
- + Network-wide blocking for all DNS-using devices
- + Responsive admin dashboard with per-client visibility
- + Group-based policies for clients and block rules
- + Optional DHCP server when router is limited
- + Upstream encrypted DNS supported via dnscrypt-proxy
Cons
- - DNS-level blocking can’t remove same-domain ads
- - Client-side DoH or VPN can bypass filtering
- - Query logging can expose sensitive browsing metadata
- - Requires self-hosting, updates, and basic ops skills
- - Past v6 WebUI/API DoS advisory (patched later)
Cloudflare DNS
Pros
- + DNS-only mode plus full-tunnel WARP option
- + MASQUE support in current WARP apps
- + Resolver logs documented as deleted within 25 hours
- + Independent attestation report for public DNS resolver
- + Free tier available for 1.1.1.1 and WARP
- + Family DNS variants for malware and adult blocking
Cons
- - Not designed for anonymity or anti-tracking
- - Does not reliably bypass geo-restrictions
- - WARP client collects some usage/performance metrics
- - WARP+ Unlimited pricing varies and is shown in-app
- - DNS category filtering can misclassify sites
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.