Netgate (pfSense) vs GL.iNet
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Netgate (pfSense) and GL.iNet.
Netgate (pfSense) Official pfSense hardware appliances with VPN support. | GL.iNet Travel routers with built-in OpenVPN and WireGuard. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 (153 reviews) | 4.5 (199 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $189/mo | From $29.9/mo |
| Best For | Best for users seeking reliable VPN protection for online privacy | Best for users seeking reliable VPN protection for online privacy |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
| Visit GL.iNet → |
Netgate (pfSense)
Pros
- + Supports IPsec and OpenVPN in core system
- + WireGuard available via Package Manager
- + OpenVPN DCO boosts performance on pfSense Plus
- + Hardware crypto acceleration options documented
- + CE is Apache-2.0 open source
Cons
- - OpenVPN DCO requires pfSense Plus 22.05+
- - WireGuard is an add-on package, not core
- - L2TP is supported but strongly discouraged
- - Steeper learning curve than consumer routers
GL.iNet
Pros
- + Router-level WireGuard and OpenVPN support
- + Granular policy-based VPN routing options
- + Kill switch modes to block non-VPN traffic
- + OpenWrt-based firmware with advanced configurability
- + Optional GoodCloud remote management and access
Cons
- - Stock firmware isn’t fully open-source end-to-end
- - Kill switch and policy routing can be complex
- - VPN throughput depends heavily on router model
- - Cloud features add additional privacy surface
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.