Metasploit vs OpenVAS
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Metasploit and OpenVAS.
Metasploit Penetration testing framework. | OpenVAS Full-featured open-source vulnerability scanner. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 (300 reviews) | 4.3 (236 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | free |
| Starting Price | From $0/mo | Free |
| Best For | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Metasploit
Pros
- + Open-source Framework under BSD-style license
- + Rich module ecosystem: exploit, auxiliary, post, payload
- + msfvenom supports payload generation and encoding
- + Official nightly installers for Windows, macOS, Linux
- + Pro adds web UI, wizards, and reporting
- + Database and workspaces help organize engagement data
Cons
- - Antivirus commonly flags Windows installer contents
- - Metasploit Pro pricing requires contacting sales
- - Sensitive assessment data security is your responsibility
- - Not a standalone vulnerability management platform
- - Pro features and licensing add operational overhead
OpenVAS
Pros
- + Open-source scanner core (GPL-licensed)
- + GMP API support with gvm-tools automation
- + Modular stack: scanner, manager, and web UI
- + Extensible NVT tests written in NASL
- + Community documentation and container deployment options
Cons
- - Multi-component setup is operationally complex
- - Community Feed coverage is more limited than Enterprise
- - Not as beginner-friendly as some commercial scanners
- - Scan time varies widely; tuning is often required
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.