Lumiproxy vs Quad9
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Lumiproxy and Quad9.
Lumiproxy Proxies for web scraping and data collection | Quad9 Non-profit DNS resolver with threat blocking (9.9.9.9). | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.5 (174 reviews) | 4.5 (432 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | paid | free |
| Starting Price | From $0/mo | Free |
| Best For | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools | Best for users wanting private and fast DNS resolution |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Lumiproxy
Pros
- + 195-country coverage with geo-targeting options
- + HTTP and SOCKS5 protocol support
- + Traffic-based, unlimited, and static plan types
- + User guides for setup and API-style extraction
- + Static residential plans marketed with unlimited bandwidth
Cons
- - Refund eligibility is narrow and plan-dependent
- - Hong Kong SAR governing law jurisdiction
- - Customer reviews show reliability and support complaints
- - Performance figures are vendor-claimed, not audited
Quad9
Pros
- + Free resolver; no account or sign-up required
- + Threat-blocking option for malicious domains
- + Supports DoT, DoH, DNSCrypt, DoH3, DoQ
- + States it does not store client IP addresses
- + Opt-in ECS endpoint for better CDN geolocation
- + Transparent block behavior and tester guidance
Cons
- - Not a VPN; websites still see your IP
- - ECS mode leaks partial client network info
- - NXDOMAIN blocking can confuse troubleshooting
- - No independent no-logs audit confirmed in sources
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.