LibreWolf vs Tor Browser
A detailed comparison to help you choose between LibreWolf and Tor Browser.
LibreWolf Firefox fork with privacy by default — no telemetry. | Tor Browser Anonymous web browsing | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 (271 reviews) | 4.3 (18000 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | free |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Best For | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools | Maximum anonymous browsing |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
LibreWolf
Pros
- + Strong privacy defaults out of the box
- + uBlock Origin included with custom filter lists
- + Resist Fingerprinting enabled by default
- + Telemetry and studies disabled/removed
- + Total Cookie Protection (dFPI) enabled
- + LibreWolf UI plus overrides for tuning
Cons
- - More site breakage than stock Firefox
- - DRM disabled by default; streaming may fail
- - Updates depend on packaging and user hygiene
- - WebGL disabled by default; some apps break
- - Past report of URLs logged to system journal
Tor Browser
Pros
- + Routes browser traffic through the Tor network
- + Strong anti-fingerprinting defenses, including letterboxing
- + One-click New Identity clears data and circuits
- + Security levels (Standard/Safer/Safest) for risk control
- + Free to use with no paid tiers
Cons
- - Often slower due to relay routing and network load
- - Higher security levels break many modern websites
- - Some sites block Tor exits or trigger CAPTCHAs
- - Downloading files can leak outside Tor if opened externally
- - Not suitable for torrenting; IP leaks are common
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.