LastPass vs Bitwarden Extension
A detailed comparison to help you choose between LastPass and Bitwarden Extension.
LastPass Popular password manager with browser extension. | Bitwarden Extension Bitwarden browser extension for autofill and vault access. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.5 (319 reviews) | 4.6 (273 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | free |
| Starting Price | From $3/mo | Free |
| Best For | Best for users managing multiple passwords securely | Best for users managing multiple passwords securely |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
LastPass
Pros
- + Zero-knowledge model with local encryption/decryption
- + AES-256 and PBKDF2-SHA256 (600,000 iterations)
- + FIDO2/WebAuthn hardware-key and biometric passwordless options
- + Security Dashboard and dark web monitoring available to free users
- + Business plans include admin console and security policies
Cons
- - 2022 breach involved theft of customer vault backups
- - Some customer data in backups was unencrypted
- - Free plan limited to one device type
- - Hardware-key MFA requires paid plan in some cases
Bitwarden Extension
Pros
- + Strong, documented zero-knowledge encryption model
- + Multiple autofill methods: UI, hotkey, right-click
- + Open-source clients, including the extension code
- + Extension-specific third-party assessment listed by Bitwarden
- + Biometric unlock supported via desktop integration
Cons
- - Biometric unlock usually requires desktop app running
- - Safari setup constrained by Apple distribution rules
- - Autofill/password generation can feel clunky on some sites
- - Browser-extension threat surface remains inherently high-risk
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.