IVPN vs Private Internet Access
A detailed comparison to help you choose between IVPN and Private Internet Access.
IVPN Privacy-first VPN with multi-hop and no email required. | Private Internet Access Open-source VPN with proven no-logs policy backed by court records. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 (531 reviews) | 4.3 (121 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $2/mo | From $2.03/mo |
| Best For | Best for privacy-focused users wanting strong VPN encryption | Best for users seeking reliable VPN protection for online privacy |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
IVPN
Pros
- + Open-source apps with public repositories
- + Third-party no-logs audit on record
- + Multi-hop support for stronger privacy
- + Clear pricing with no teaser discounts
- + 30-day refund policy is documented
Cons
- - Smaller server network than mass-market VPNs
- - Multi-hop increases latency and reduces speeds
- - Streaming access not guaranteed by IVPN
- - iOS kill switch removed due to Apple issue
- - Device limits enforced via logins/devices model
Private Internet Access
Pros
- + Published Deloitte no-logs audit reports
- + Open-source apps on GitHub
- + WireGuard and OpenVPN support
- + Split tunneling and multi-hop options
- + Port forwarding available in supported regions
- + Quarterly transparency reporting
Cons
- - US jurisdiction may not fit strict threat models
- - Port forwarding not available on all locations
- - Streaming access can be inconsistent by platform
- - MACE is limited versus full browser ad blockers
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.