Internxt vs Tresorit
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Internxt and Tresorit.
Internxt Open-source, zero-knowledge encrypted cloud storage from Spain. | Tresorit End-to-end encrypted cloud storage. Swiss-hosted. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 (290 reviews) | 4.5 (350 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | From $0/mo | From $10.42/mo |
| Best For | Best for users needing secure cloud storage for sensitive files | Best for users needing secure cloud storage for sensitive files |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Internxt
Pros
- + Client-side encryption for file contents
- + Open-source Drive apps on GitHub
- + Rclone and WebDAV options for advanced workflows
- + Free 1GB plan for testing
- + 30-day money-back guarantee on paid plans
- + 2FA support via authenticator apps
Cons
- - Metadata like filenames and sizes is stored server-side
- - Backup can behave like one-way mirroring
- - Lifetime plans vary; reseller deals may exclude features
- - Reports of inconsistent reliability and support
Tresorit
Pros
- + Zero-knowledge end-to-end encryption by design
- + File Requests for secure external document intake
- + ISO 27001:2022 certification (per Tresorit)
- + S3-compatible API with local encryption model
- + Swiss jurisdiction (Tresorit AG)
Cons
- - Premium pricing versus mainstream cloud storage
- - E2EE can add friction and slower workflows
- - Strict refund policy after trial ends
- - Not positioned as open-source clients
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.