Internxt vs Proton Drive
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Internxt and Proton Drive.
Internxt Open-source, zero-knowledge encrypted cloud storage from Spain. | Proton Drive Encrypted cloud storage from Proton. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 (290 reviews) | 4.3 (340 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | From $0/mo | From $0/mo |
| Best For | Best for users needing secure cloud storage for sensitive files | Best for users needing secure cloud storage for sensitive files |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Internxt
Pros
- + Client-side encryption for file contents
- + Open-source Drive apps on GitHub
- + Rclone and WebDAV options for advanced workflows
- + Free 1GB plan for testing
- + 30-day money-back guarantee on paid plans
- + 2FA support via authenticator apps
Cons
- - Metadata like filenames and sizes is stored server-side
- - Backup can behave like one-way mirroring
- - Lifetime plans vary; reseller deals may exclude features
- - Reports of inconsistent reliability and support
Proton Drive
Pros
- + End-to-end encryption, Proton can’t decrypt file contents
- + Filenames, folders, and thumbnails are end-to-end encrypted
- + Open-source client apps and SDK components
- + Drive Plus includes 10-year file version history
- + Free tier available for basic storage
Cons
- - Some operational metadata remains visible to Proton
- - Drive-specific audits appear older and limited in scope
- - Usability gaps versus mainstream cloud storage in reviews
- - Client-side encryption can add performance overhead
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.