Firefox vs LibreWolf
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Firefox and LibreWolf.
Firefox Privacy-focused browser with Enhanced Tracking Protection. | LibreWolf Firefox fork with privacy by default — no telemetry. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 (270 reviews) | 4.6 (271 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | free |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Best For | Best for privacy-conscious users browsing the web | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Firefox
Pros
- + Total Cookie Protection enabled by default
- + Enhanced Tracking Protection blocks known trackers
- + HTTPS-Only Mode reduces downgrade risks
- + DNS over HTTPS available for privacy
- + Open-source code under MPL licensing
- + Global Privacy Control signal supported
Cons
- - Private Browsing doesn’t hide activity from ISP
- - Some telemetry/data processing described in Privacy Notice
- - GPC is a signal; sites may ignore it
- - Past controversy over privacy-preserving attribution default
LibreWolf
Pros
- + Strong privacy defaults out of the box
- + uBlock Origin included with custom filter lists
- + Resist Fingerprinting enabled by default
- + Telemetry and studies disabled/removed
- + Total Cookie Protection (dFPI) enabled
- + LibreWolf UI plus overrides for tuning
Cons
- - More site breakage than stock Firefox
- - DRM disabled by default; streaming may fail
- - Updates depend on packaging and user hygiene
- - WebGL disabled by default; some apps break
- - Past report of URLs logged to system journal
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.