Encryptr vs KeePassXC
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Encryptr and KeePassXC.
Encryptr Zero-knowledge encrypted password manager. | KeePassXC Offline, open-source password manager. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 (315 reviews) | 4.6 (216 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | free |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Best For | Best for users managing multiple passwords securely | Best for users managing multiple passwords securely |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Encryptr
Pros
- + Open-source code published under GPLv3
- + Zero-knowledge design intent documented by SpiderOak
- + Stores passwords, cards, and key/value entries
- + Cross-platform apps were offered (desktop and mobile)
- + Built on Crypton framework with published audits
Cons
- - Discontinued; no longer an active product
- - Last public release notes date to March 2020
- - Not a modern feature-rich password manager
- - No clear evidence of current Encryptr-specific audits
KeePassXC
Pros
- + Local-first: no mandatory cloud account
- + KeePass KDBX compatibility across many clients
- + Documented browser integration for autofill
- + Supports SSH agent integration (Pageant/OpenSSH on Windows)
- + Published audits and ANSSI CSPN certification
- + Free pricing model
Cons
- - No built-in cloud sync or team sharing
- - Linux sandboxed browsers often unsupported for extension
- - Unlocked vault data exists in system memory
- - Some edge-case vulnerabilities require prompt updates
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.