Encryptr vs Bitwarden
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Encryptr and Bitwarden.
Encryptr Zero-knowledge encrypted password manager. | Bitwarden Open-source password manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 (315 reviews) | 4.6 (28000 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free | From $0/mo |
| Best For | Best for users managing multiple passwords securely | Best free password manager |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Encryptr
Pros
- + Open-source code published under GPLv3
- + Zero-knowledge design intent documented by SpiderOak
- + Stores passwords, cards, and key/value entries
- + Cross-platform apps were offered (desktop and mobile)
- + Built on Crypton framework with published audits
Cons
- - Discontinued; no longer an active product
- - Last public release notes date to March 2020
- - Not a modern feature-rich password manager
- - No clear evidence of current Encryptr-specific audits
Bitwarden
Pros
- + Documented end-to-end encryption design and primitives
- + PBKDF2 and Argon2 KDF options available
- + FIDO2/WebAuthn 2FA available on free accounts
- + Self-hosting supported with published guidance
- + Bitwarden Send enables expiring encrypted sharing links
- + 30-day refund policy stated in Terms
Cons
- - US jurisdiction may not suit strict threat models
- - Server code licensing includes Bitwarden License components
- - Stronger KDF settings can slow vault unlock
- - Self-hosted deployments make outbound connections by default
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.