Element vs Signal
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Element and Signal.
Element Decentralized messenger built on Matrix protocol. | Signal Private messenger | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 (461 reviews) | 4.8 (45000 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | free |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Best For | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools | Most secure messaging |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Element
Pros
- + Works across Matrix servers; supports federation
- + End-to-end encryption supported and encouraged by default
- + Open-source client code available on GitHub
- + Secure Backup and device verification for multi-device E2EE
- + Element Call roadmap for modern voice/video
Cons
- - Encrypted rooms still expose some metadata to servers
- - Multi-device encryption setup can be confusing
- - Enterprise pricing is sales-led, not fully public
- - Security track record includes past critical client vulnerabilities
Signal
Pros
- + Free app with optional donations
- + Publicly documented Signal Protocol specs
- + Minimal retained data in subpoena examples
- + Usernames reduce phone-number sharing
- + Open-source core code on GitHub
- + End-to-end encrypted group calling design
Cons
- - Phone number required for registration
- - Some anti-spam server components reportedly closed
- - Backup recovery key adds user responsibility
- - No official performance benchmarks published
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.