Cloudflare WARP vs SOAX
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Cloudflare WARP and SOAX.
Cloudflare WARP Free VPN-like privacy | SOAX Residential proxies and scraping infrastructure | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 (15000 reviews) | 3.5 (213 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | From $0/mo | From $0/mo |
| Best For | Free basic privacy | Best for users seeking privacy and security tools |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Cloudflare WARP
Pros
- + DNS-only mode supports DoH and DoT
- + Traffic tunneling uses MASQUE to Cloudflare edge
- + WireGuard protocol supported (documented on Linux)
- + WARP+ Unlimited focuses on routing performance
- + No account required for basic use
Cons
- - US jurisdiction (Cloudflare, Inc.)
- - Not designed for choosing exit countries
- - Shared egress IPs can trigger captchas/geolocation issues
- - Refunds and billing handled by app stores
- - Cloudflare documents some data collection (not zero-log)
SOAX
Pros
- + HTTP/HTTPS/SOCKS5 support with TCP/UDP transport
- + Geo targeting: country, region, city, ISP
- + Packages separate auth, rules, and usage tracking
- + DNS resolution and domain-blocking controls
- + Transparent per-GB pricing with geo tiers
Cons
- - Not a consumer VPN or true anonymity tool
- - Non-refundable fees by default per refund policy
- - Usage billing counts retries and partial responses
- - No independent no-logs audit confirmed in sources
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.