Cloudflare WARP vs Quad9
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Cloudflare WARP and Quad9.
Cloudflare WARP Free VPN-like privacy | Quad9 Non-profit DNS resolver with threat blocking (9.9.9.9). | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 (15000 reviews) | 4.5 (432 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | free |
| Starting Price | From $0/mo | Free |
| Best For | Free basic privacy | Best for users wanting private and fast DNS resolution |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Cloudflare WARP
Pros
- + DNS-only mode supports DoH and DoT
- + Traffic tunneling uses MASQUE to Cloudflare edge
- + WireGuard protocol supported (documented on Linux)
- + WARP+ Unlimited focuses on routing performance
- + No account required for basic use
Cons
- - US jurisdiction (Cloudflare, Inc.)
- - Not designed for choosing exit countries
- - Shared egress IPs can trigger captchas/geolocation issues
- - Refunds and billing handled by app stores
- - Cloudflare documents some data collection (not zero-log)
Quad9
Pros
- + Free resolver; no account or sign-up required
- + Threat-blocking option for malicious domains
- + Supports DoT, DoH, DNSCrypt, DoH3, DoQ
- + States it does not store client IP addresses
- + Opt-in ECS endpoint for better CDN geolocation
- + Transparent block behavior and tester guidance
Cons
- - Not a VPN; websites still see your IP
- - ECS mode leaks partial client network info
- - NXDOMAIN blocking can confuse troubleshooting
- - No independent no-logs audit confirmed in sources
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.