Cloudflare WARP vs PureVPN
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Cloudflare WARP and PureVPN.
Cloudflare WARP Free VPN-like privacy | PureVPN VPN with 6500+ servers in 70+ countries. Port forwarding and dedicated IPs available. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 (15000 reviews) | 4.0 (581 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | From $0/mo | From $2.14/mo |
| Best For | Free basic privacy | Best for users seeking reliable VPN protection for online privacy |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Cloudflare WARP
Pros
- + DNS-only mode supports DoH and DoT
- + Traffic tunneling uses MASQUE to Cloudflare edge
- + WireGuard protocol supported (documented on Linux)
- + WARP+ Unlimited focuses on routing performance
- + No account required for basic use
Cons
- - US jurisdiction (Cloudflare, Inc.)
- - Not designed for choosing exit countries
- - Shared egress IPs can trigger captchas/geolocation issues
- - Refunds and billing handled by app stores
- - Cloudflare documents some data collection (not zero-log)
PureVPN
Pros
- + WireGuard, OpenVPN, and IKEv2/IPSec support
- + Strong streaming unblocking in TechRadar tests
- + Kill switch available on desktop platforms
- + Windows split tunneling support
- + Dedicated IP and port forwarding add-ons
Cons
- - OpenVPN speeds lag behind WireGuard
- - 31-day refunds exclude renewal payments
- - Past zero-log marketing controversy hurts trust
- - Split tunneling availability varies by platform
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.