Cloudflare WARP vs IPVanish
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Cloudflare WARP and IPVanish.
Cloudflare WARP Free VPN-like privacy | IPVanish Fast VPN with unlimited simultaneous connections. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 (15000 reviews) | 4.0 (123 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | From $0/mo | From $2.49/mo |
| Best For | Free basic privacy | Best for users prioritizing fast VPN connections for streaming and browsing |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Cloudflare WARP
Pros
- + DNS-only mode supports DoH and DoT
- + Traffic tunneling uses MASQUE to Cloudflare edge
- + WireGuard protocol supported (documented on Linux)
- + WARP+ Unlimited focuses on routing performance
- + No account required for basic use
Cons
- - US jurisdiction (Cloudflare, Inc.)
- - Not designed for choosing exit countries
- - Shared egress IPs can trigger captchas/geolocation issues
- - Refunds and billing handled by app stores
- - Cloudflare documents some data collection (not zero-log)
IPVanish
Pros
- + 999 simultaneous connections (effectively unlimited devices)
- + WireGuard, OpenVPN, and IKEv2 protocol support
- + OpenVPN Scramble obfuscation for restrictive networks
- + Third-party no-logs audit documentation exists (2022)
- + SOCKS5 proxy option included
Cons
- - US jurisdiction may concern high-risk users
- - 2016 logging incident under prior ownership
- - Kill switch reliability issues reported in testing
- - Refund policy often excludes monthly plans
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.