ClamAV vs WEBROOT master
A detailed comparison to help you choose between ClamAV and WEBROOT master.
ClamAV Open-source antivirus engine used by mail servers worldwide. | WEBROOT master Antivirus | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 (237 reviews) | 4.0 (74 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | paid |
| Starting Price | Free | From $0/mo |
| Best For | Best for users needing comprehensive antivirus and malware protection | Best for users needing comprehensive antivirus and malware protection |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
ClamAV
Pros
- + Free, GPLv2 open-source antivirus engine
- + Strong for mail gateway and server scanning
- + Daemon mode enables efficient repeated scanning
- + Linux on-access scanning via clamonacc
- + Official signatures shipped in signed CVD containers
- + Supports local Unix socket or TCP clamd protocol
Cons
- - No on-access scanning feature on Windows
- - Not a full consumer AV suite or GUI-first tool
- - clamd TCP socket is unauthenticated by default
- - Third-party signatures can add security risk
- - clamscan can be inefficient for frequent scans
WEBROOT master
Pros
- + Supports WireGuard, OpenVPN, and IKEv2 protocols
- + Kill switch behavior is documented by Webroot
- + Split tunneling is available in the VPN app
- + Clear device-based VPN tiers (3/5/10 devices)
- + Generally smooth user experience per reviewers
Cons
- - “WEBROOT master” isn’t a clearly defined official SKU
- - Independent no-logs audit not clearly evidenced
- - Some reviewers report weaker malware detection
- - VPN data retention includes some connection metadata
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.