ClamAV vs Norton 360
A detailed comparison to help you choose between ClamAV and Norton 360.
ClamAV Open-source antivirus engine used by mail servers worldwide. | Norton 360 Comprehensive security suite with VPN and dark web monitoring. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 (237 reviews) | 4.2 (457 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | paid |
| Starting Price | Free | From $3.25/mo |
| Best For | Best for users needing comprehensive antivirus and malware protection | Best for privacy-focused users wanting strong VPN encryption |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
ClamAV
Pros
- + Free, GPLv2 open-source antivirus engine
- + Strong for mail gateway and server scanning
- + Daemon mode enables efficient repeated scanning
- + Linux on-access scanning via clamonacc
- + Official signatures shipped in signed CVD containers
- + Supports local Unix socket or TCP clamd protocol
Cons
- - No on-access scanning feature on Windows
- - Not a full consumer AV suite or GUI-first tool
- - clamd TCP socket is unauthenticated by default
- - Third-party signatures can add security risk
- - clamscan can be inefficient for frequent scans
Norton 360
Pros
- + Bundled antivirus, VPN, firewall, password manager
- + Supports WireGuard, OpenVPN, IPsec, Mimic
- + No-logs policy assessed by VerSprite audits
- + Over 100-country server coverage advertised
- + Mimic protocol aimed at bypassing restrictions
- + Plan comparison clearly lists feature differences
Cons
- - Protocol selection not available on iOS
- - VPN device limit depends on plan tier
- - U.S. jurisdiction may deter high-risk users
- - Not positioned as open-source VPN stack
- - Privacy policy allows some device/app metadata collection
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.