ClamAV vs Malwarebytes
A detailed comparison to help you choose between ClamAV and Malwarebytes.
ClamAV Open-source antivirus engine used by mail servers worldwide. | Malwarebytes Anti-malware specialist catching zero-day threats. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 (237 reviews) | 4.4 (300 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free | From $3.33/mo |
| Best For | Best for users needing comprehensive antivirus and malware protection | Best for users needing comprehensive antivirus and malware protection |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
ClamAV
Pros
- + Free, GPLv2 open-source antivirus engine
- + Strong for mail gateway and server scanning
- + Daemon mode enables efficient repeated scanning
- + Linux on-access scanning via clamonacc
- + Official signatures shipped in signed CVD containers
- + Supports local Unix socket or TCP clamd protocol
Cons
- - No on-access scanning feature on Windows
- - Not a full consumer AV suite or GUI-first tool
- - clamd TCP socket is unauthenticated by default
- - Third-party signatures can add security risk
- - clamscan can be inefficient for frequent scans
Malwarebytes
Pros
- + Independently audited no-logs VPN (per Malwarebytes)
- + WireGuard protocol support
- + Owned, diskless (RAM-only) server claims
- + Clear VPN privacy policy on non-collection claims
- + Strong mobile scam protection focus
Cons
- - Streaming/geoblock bypass can be inconsistent
- - US jurisdiction may concern privacy-focused users
- - VPN plan tiers can be confusing (Standard vs Plus)
- - Advanced VPN features are limited vs top competitors
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.