Bitwarden Extension vs Password Depot
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Bitwarden Extension and Password Depot.
Bitwarden Extension Bitwarden browser extension for autofill and vault access. | Password Depot Password manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 (273 reviews) | 0.0 (0 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | |
| Starting Price | Free | Free tier available |
| Best For | Best for users managing multiple passwords securely | Best for users managing multiple passwords securely |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Bitwarden Extension
Pros
- + Strong, documented zero-knowledge encryption model
- + Multiple autofill methods: UI, hotkey, right-click
- + Open-source clients, including the extension code
- + Extension-specific third-party assessment listed by Bitwarden
- + Biometric unlock supported via desktop integration
Cons
- - Biometric unlock usually requires desktop app running
- - Safari setup constrained by Apple distribution rules
- - Autofill/password generation can feel clunky on some sites
- - Browser-extension threat surface remains inherently high-risk
Password Depot
Pros
- + No forced vendor cloud; file-based vaults
- + One-time purchase pricing for Windows
- + Supports WebDAV, SFTP, and other protocols
- + Browser add-ons use Native Messaging on Windows
- + SySS pentest certificate for Password Depot 19
- + AES-GCM default for new databases (Windows)
Cons
- - Sync security depends on your storage choices
- - Linux client not feature-parity with Windows
- - Browser extension is not standalone
- - Keeping versions aligned can be mandatory
- - Interface can feel complex and option-heavy
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.