Bitwarden Extension vs Encryptr
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Bitwarden Extension and Encryptr.
Bitwarden Extension Bitwarden browser extension for autofill and vault access. | Encryptr Zero-knowledge encrypted password manager. | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 (273 reviews) | 3.8 (315 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | free | free |
| Starting Price | Free | Free |
| Best For | Best for users managing multiple passwords securely | Best for users managing multiple passwords securely |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | — |
Bitwarden Extension
Pros
- + Strong, documented zero-knowledge encryption model
- + Multiple autofill methods: UI, hotkey, right-click
- + Open-source clients, including the extension code
- + Extension-specific third-party assessment listed by Bitwarden
- + Biometric unlock supported via desktop integration
Cons
- - Biometric unlock usually requires desktop app running
- - Safari setup constrained by Apple distribution rules
- - Autofill/password generation can feel clunky on some sites
- - Browser-extension threat surface remains inherently high-risk
Encryptr
Pros
- + Open-source code published under GPLv3
- + Zero-knowledge design intent documented by SpiderOak
- + Stores passwords, cards, and key/value entries
- + Cross-platform apps were offered (desktop and mobile)
- + Built on Crypton framework with published audits
Cons
- - Discontinued; no longer an active product
- - Last public release notes date to March 2020
- - Not a modern feature-rich password manager
- - No clear evidence of current Encryptr-specific audits
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new privacy tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.